This seems like a false trichotomy:
It quite literally provides the poor nations of the world with their daily bread - without which their populations can either starve, riot or overthrow their governments.
Er.
If said populations do riot and/or overthrow their governments, they'll still starve. So it's not a choice as stated; in the circumstance postulated, starvation is inevitable, while rioting and insurrection are optional in the meantime.
... Riot hard enough, I suppose, and maybe there'll be enough food for the survivors...?
Comments