I think somebody's spamstituter is busted

Silly spam of the day:

    Subject: Get the freshest {SPUR_2} Feel Pleasure from
    Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 22:56:37 -0500

Good day,
{SPUR_1}
{SPUR_3}
  {SPUR_4}
  All you need is here: {SPUR_DOMAIN}
  Just check yourself!

Er.

Just a hunch, but I rather suspect that some of those {FIELD}s were meant to be substituted.

The names of the fields suggest that spurious text was to be inserted.

But... why a spurious domain?  Doesn't that rather defeat the purpose... almost as much as not substituting the metasyntactic infillables at all?

Quick challenge: think of any substitution for {SPUR_2} that would make the subject line make sense!